Grand Paradox Theory, a theory of God
I will be writing a book on what I believe is the absolute THEORY OF EVERYTHING. I am a student in physics, philosophy, and architecture. Here is a synopsis:
-
The Grand Paradox Theory is a theory of systems. Each system is cyclical in manner. When one goes as far microscopic as possible, one reaches what is almost as far macroscopic as possible. Almost because they will only once in their lifetime reach equilibrium. Yet it is almost because of the way time operates. Time is a simultaneous comparison of frames, and the equilibrium is between those frames. Yet there is no frame that exists in the equilibrium. This is the simplest way to describe the Grand Paradox Theory: I will use the paradox of time.
-
This is the end of the system and the birth of a system, simultaneously.
-
Consider time, which is necessarily created to project consciousness.
-
In time, there exists a “time” where time has no effect.
-
-
This is a moment. Yet there is no such thing as this moment, because it is two things at once.
-
There is only a comparison. For there to be a single moment, there must exist two moments.
-
Therefore, every moment is a paradoxical fractal within itself.
-
Therefore, every non-moment is a moment.
-
Hence, the Grand Paradox Theory thus invents the concept of eternity.
-
In an eternity dictated by two dichotomized ideas connected by a paradox, one must interject that it it can only be one or the other. This is true. The Paradox can never exist, God can never exist. Yet both intrinsic properties must exist.
-
This is the effect of quantum probability. No property concretly exists intrinsically, but only leans toward one quality or another. There is always a probability it will be the other quality. This probability is dictated by where “it” exists exists in comparison to the larger picture.
-
Finally, in the ultimate Paradox, the “moment” between moment 1 and moment 2 must exist, yet can never be reached. This is the definition of the ultimate God. He both defines moment 1 and moment 2, and exists as both moments.
-
-
So far, I have thought of 9 core paradoxes which define humanity. Each paradox had 3 elements: passive, active, and paradoxical. The paradoxical is the moment between the passive and active which should never exist, but does
This hypothetical train of thought arose from my best friend’s description of Cogs. Suppose there was a central cog, which powered a cog below and above it.
1 *
2 X
3 *
Cog 1 and 3 are not aware of each other, ever, in all eternity. Yet they somehow sense the effects of each other, however they relate it to themselves. Cog 2, though, intrinsically knows the function of cog 1 and 3. It is selfless, because it defines itself by both 1 and 3. Cog 1 and 3 conversely are selfish. Yet through their selfishness they create out of necessity Cog 2.
Furthermore, I define each of the cogs:
1. passive — that which is perceived
2. Paradox — the moment of transition
3. active — that which is done
I have conjured up a total of 9 entities which all share the property of a paradox. I have wayyyy more written on this, but an easy example is Space.
1. passive — X
2. active — Y
3. paradoxical — Z
Here is the explanation:
Consider a 2 dimensional picture of a fish. Can one who only has perception of 2 dimensions perceive what the picure is? No, because if you imagine existing in the picture, you would see nothing. Now move 100 feet away from the picture (in the z dimension). It appears as a dot. This is the passive element, the initial baby perception of space. Now pretend you displaced yourself inch from the picture. You can perceive it, in full glory but it is still profoundly unclear. Now move far enough away to where you can tell what the picture is. This is the middle point. You see and understand the meaning of the picture. This is knowledge.
